Jump to content

Solid-state nanopores: Difference between revisions

From Nanopore Wiki
Restore visible brand name to Nanopore Wiki
Tag: Manual revert
Use topic-specific Wikimedia Commons illustrations
Line 2: Line 2:
<translate>
<translate>
<!--T:1-->
<!--T:1-->
[[File:202001 nanopore sequencing.svg|thumb|right|320px|Principle of nanopore sequencing. Source: Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0.]]
[[File:Nanopore_sequencing_principle.png|thumb|right|320px|Principle of nanopore sequencing. Source: Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0.]]
'''Solid-state nanopores''' is part of the Nanopore Wiki learning path. Solid-state nanopores are fabricated in inorganic, polymer, glass, or two-dimensional materials and are important for device-oriented nanopore sensing.
'''Solid-state nanopores''' is part of the Nanopore Wiki learning path. Solid-state nanopores are fabricated in inorganic, polymer, glass, or two-dimensional materials and are important for device-oriented nanopore sensing.



Revision as of 16:47, 2 July 2026

Principle of nanopore sequencing. Source: Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0.

Solid-state nanopores is part of the Nanopore Wiki learning path. Solid-state nanopores are fabricated in inorganic, polymer, glass, or two-dimensional materials and are important for device-oriented nanopore sensing.

Core concepts

  • Materials include silicon nitride, silicon dioxide, glass, graphene, and other thin membranes.
  • Fabrication controls pore size, thickness, surface chemistry, and device integration.
  • Strengths include mechanical stability and chip compatibility.
  • Challenges include surface noise, wetting, clogging, and pore-to-pore variability.

Device workflow

Step Description
1 Choose membrane material and pore fabrication method.
2 Wet and condition the pore before recording.
3 Measure open-pore conductance and compare with expected geometry.
4 Use controls to separate target events from surface and clogging artifacts.

Typical applications

  • Particle and polymer sensing.
  • Protein and nucleic-acid translocation studies.
  • Integrated microfluidic and chip-based devices.

Common pitfalls

  • Equating nominal pore diameter with effective sensing diameter.
  • Ignoring surface charge, adsorption, and wetting history.
  • Comparing solid-state and biological pores without considering thickness and noise.

References